Talk:Honda CR-X

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

How many?

How many crx sirs are in America today? 69.67.89.18 (talk) 19:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube vids

The YouTube vids cover events that really did happen so they shou be relevant! Har1MAS1415 (talk) 08:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Har1MAS1415 has been adding massive amounts of content with dubious sourcing, most of it very obscure like a Rover 200 once driving around Donington Park. Please read WP:CRUFT and WP:RS. Not sure if there is an express policy on what level of motorsport is to be included. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 14:05, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Har1MAS1415, something isn't relevant, let alone of encyclopedic value, because they happened. Drmies (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they ARE true, at least!

Did the research! Har1MAS1415 (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just because they are true, doesn't mean they should be included. Only notable content that is encyclopedic worthy, should be included. Expandinglight5 (talk) 18:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]